Picture
How does PayPal Wallet work?

My focus is to review the two implementations of the digital wallet PayPal is currently developing/implementing for off-line shopping and how the company's acquisitions will help enrich the experience.  This means not discussing other PayPal efforts in the mobile space such as PayPal Here.  

PayPal Wallet on PayPal Rails - This is the implementation of PayPal Wallet that is currently available to be used at Abercrombie & Fitch, Abercrombie Kids, Hollister California, The Home Depot and Jos. A. Bank.  

1)  It is a cloud-based digital wallet that you can access at the merchant's point-of-sale by entering your phone number + password or swiping your PayPal card + password.  The phone number and the card are just different ways of entering the token that identifies a wallet in the cloud (there is a unique link between an ID and a wallet).  The password is the way to authenticate the user. 

In fact, the cloud-based digital wallet I am talking about is the same PayPal account that many of us are accustomed to using for certain online transactions.  Allowing users to access it at the point-of-sale is a 'natural' extension of its traditional functionality, although it requires new technology and new partnerships to implement.

2)  Off-line transactions, just like on-line transactions, travel on 'PayPal's rails' and are also processed by PayPal.  Changes in the software running in the point-of-sale devices and in the middleware that connects the merchant with its processor, along with back-end integration with the merchant systems, is what allows acceptance of phone number + password and the direct connection between the merchant and PayPal.  

PayPal's agreements with hardware manufacturers - such as Verifone and Ingenico - and middleware providers - such as AJB - have made this system possible.

3)  PayPal is the merchant of record for all transactions.  In fact, in the 'Account Activity Summary' (step number six in the app sequence provided at the end of this post) the user can see all the steps the payment process goes through.  First, it is instantly authorized by the issuer of the card linked to the account.  Hours later (as part of a batch process), there is first a cash transfer from the card issuer to a PayPal account and then a cash payment from the PayPal account to the merchant account.  

The graph below illustrates this process - in a very simplified manner - using the example of MasterCard as being the preferred method of payment.

4)  It is not an NFC-based solution.  PayPal is developing a truly digital wallet, not a mobile wallet.  As such, the company wants to enable users to pay without using any device (as is the case with phone number + password), which precludes it from utilizing NFC technology.  

One could easily argue that swiping a PayPal card breaks this paradigm but, most likely, allowing for this method of payment is just part of the educational process.  The company's first priority is to teach consumers to think about PayPal when paying at the store, swiping is what most people are comfortable with doing.  

Another reason that may be behind the issuance of the cards is that only the most advanced POSs can support the upgrades required to accept phone number + password as method of entry.  The changes required to accept the card are simpler.

Below are pictures of the PayPal card.
5)  The phone plays a limited role (please refer to the bottom of this article for a description of the steps required to make a payment using PayPal).  When checking out at a store, the consumer is interacting directly with the POS.  It is only after the transaction has taken place that the user will receive notifications on her phone regarding transaction status.  She will also be able to see a form of electronic receipt with full information on the merchant, amount paid (broken down by retail price, sales tax and other expenses such as handling, shipping or insurance) and item description.  

6)  The wallet can house loyalty / reward cards and coupons.  These benefits will be used automatically at POS.

Although the on-line account has been revamped for users of PayPal's off-line services, no options are yet available to set preferred method of payment based on merchant or amount.

PayPal Wallet on Discover Rails - This implementation of the wallet is enabled by the PayPal / Discover agreement made public on August 22nd of this year.    Let's focus on the differences:

1)  This deal enables PayPal to ride Discover rails once the system goes live (spring 2013), thus no new hardware or software is required for merchants to accept PayPal's card.  Loyalty, gift, coupons and offers will be easily displayed and redeemed through the wallet.

PayPal will continue to process the transactions.

2)  PayPal will issue payment cards to its more than 50 million active users in the U.S as soon as the deal goes live. The new card will have a Discover Issuer Identification Number, or IIN, a code that identifies the card holder, and will allow users to buy from the merchants that are part of Discover's network. All that the user needs to do is swipe the card at the existing check-out machine and enter a four digit PIN. 

3)  PayPal will charge merchants when users pay with the new cards, and, in turn, will pay Discover for access to its network, on a per-transaction basis.  PayPal will define charges based on merchant type and will probably also negotiate special deals with certain merchants.  

4)  This deal places PayPal in the same league as the issuing banks in terms of its ability to issue a card that is accepted over an open-loop network.

5)  This solution, which only works with a PayPal card, completely violates the digital wallet paradigm we discussed above by not giving the choice of using a phone number instead of the wallet.  Again, PayPal's vision is a digital wallet but its first priority is to win share-of-mind in off-line payments.  The solution is clunky but it is a first step.  Additional iterations may provide much more utility.

Once again, the graph below illustrates this process - in a very simplified manner - using the example of MasterCard as being the preferred method of payment.
Note:  What is in it for Discover?  The company should pick up additional transaction volume as result of this deal while allowing the card network to fully participate in this new growing payments ecosystem.

How does Google Wallet 2.0 'stack up' against the criteria listed at the beginning of this series (click here to review the list)?

The intention is to 'rate' the solutions as they exist today.  In most cases, the wallets I am reviewing are flexible platforms that, with the right partnerships and infrastructure in place, can provide a very enriching shopping and payment experience.  But that is all in the future.  As promising as they may sound, I am comparing them against each other as they stand today.  

For this reason, this table only includes PayPal Wallet on PayPal Rails, considering the locations where it is currently available  (Abercrombie & Fitch, Abercrombie Kids, Hollister California, The Home Depot and Jos. A. Bank).  Hopefully, I will update my review in 2Q2013 after PayPal Wallet on Discover Rails launches or earlier as the number of features and relailers increase.
Reliability and Transaction Speed
It is as reliable as the well proven and tested on-line solution.  It is also a lot faster than the on-line solution, to the point that, as far as I can see, there is no noticeable difference in transaction processing speed compared to a traditional card.

Security
From a transactional perspective:  The security level when swiping the card is actually higher to the security achieved with a  traditional mag-stripe card because it uses swipe + pin rather than swipe + signature.  Unfortunately, there is quite a bit of concern around entering phone number + pin given that a) a person's number is often a relatively 'public' piece of information and b) the more information you have to enter on the key pad, the more difficult is to protect yourself from eavesdropping.  In any case, there is no dynamic authentication mechanism embedded in the process.

From a storage perspective (i.e. keeping payment credentials safe):  The fact that all credentials are in the cloud and that you need to use an ID + password to log into your account (whether on-line or on your mobile) makes the solution very safe.

In addition, it is the first non-banking payments mobile service that I have signed up for where you can feel they take 'know your customer' requirements extremely seriously.  Before allowing me to open an account, I needed to upload photos of my driver license, my social security card and a utility bill.  Inconvenient but important.

Ease of Use
The fact that the wallet must be managed on-line is a disadvantage.  The mobile app allows you to send/request money to/from another consumer, to find local businesses that accept PayPal and check in with them and to view your transactions.  Any changes you may wish to make to your payment methods (include a card, change preferences...) needs to be done from their website.
 
Wallet Functionality
It is good from the perspective that you can include all types of credit/debit cards, bank accounts, loyalty/gift cards, coupons...  The experience could be improved in three ways:  1)  Although it is in the roadmap, at the moment, you cannot set payment rules based on merchant or size of purchase;  2)  The user cannot override the preferred method of payment at the POS (via the POS or the mobile app) and not everyone is granted the 'grace period'; 3)  Issuer presence is kept at a minimum (totally absent from the mobile app and only in the form of digits, no branding, on-line), making PayPal a relatively unfriendly channel for banks that are struggling to keep customer's share of mind.

Acceptance
It is only available at a handful of stores (Abercrombie & Fitch, Abercrombie Kids, Hollister California, The Home Depot and Jos. A. Bank), none of them day-to-day retailers.

Device Availability
The app is available for iOS-, Android-, BlackBerry- and Microsoft-enabled devices. 

Valud-add Apps
Although PayPal (or eBay) has acquired a large number of companies that can bring a lot of value to the wallet (Where, RedLaser, Zong, Milo, Card.io...), none of them are yet integrated in the wallet.  Although X.commerce, a development plaform, launched over 9 months ago, it is difficult to find value-add apps built on the wallet.

Food for Thought 
I believe that we all agree that the consumer needs to be educated about mobile and digital payment options.  For this reason, I was surprised not to see any posters explaining about PayPal as a payment option at the till or even brochure on the topic.  Talking to one of the cashiers (Thank you Mary!  You know who you are) I found out that PayPal employees had visited the shop the day PayPal launched at Home Depot but that they had not visited the store since (at least, as far as she knew).  Cashiers had been given fliers and brochures that first day but they had not been replenished after they ran out.  Is PayPal not providing and requesting Best Buy to share this material or is Best Buy refusing to do so?

PayPal's current strength is on P2P transactions because it allows consumers (as well as small- and medium-size retailers) to accept cards with minimal hassle.  How is Visa's plan to bring P2P payments to U.S. account holders going to affect PayPal?

Will startups like WePay, with increased ease of integration and reduced merchant fees, gain enough momentum to affect PayPal's (or Google Checkout, for that matter) business model?

The PayPal Wallet in Action

This are the steps I followed to pay at the self checkout at a Santa Clara Home Depot.

1) A soft button gives me the option to pay with PayPal

2) Once I choose PayPal, I am asked to confirm amount

3) Next I am given the option to swipe or enter phone number
4) I enter my passcode and the transaction is processed

This is what I 'saw' happening in my PayPal App.

1)  Summary of transactions before my visit to Home Depot
4)  Transaction status right after payment at checkout counter
2)  I received two txts - One from PayPal and one from the cc linked to my account
5)  Status changed to 'Completed' hours later

3)  Summary of transactions after my visit to Home Depot

6)  Full list of 'Activity', including 'Authorization', 'Transfer' and 'Payment'
 
 
Picture
From The Huffington Post by Bill Robinson:  'There's a brutal, bloodbath-type clash looming. And it's going to be held in a very big market: how people pay for things and how small business and individuals might accept charge cards on their phones.

While PayPal was the progenitor for Internet-based payment processing, a new breed of high-tech startup is emerging which will likely disintermediate PayPal out of business.'  Continued.

Trish's Comment:  Because it is indeed a numbers game, and fraud prevention opportunities versus necessary infrastructure investment does not seem to warrant such a change in the US, I do not think that EMV will be coming to America in the short-, medium- or even long-term: This technology will probably be leaped-frogged in the US while looking for better solutions to avoid fraud in 'card-not-present' situations (for example, the 2009 British Crime Survey reports that, in the UK, 3/4 of fraud occurs during Internet/telephone/mail order transactions where EMV does not provide any benefit).  For this reason, I agree with de Geer, iZettle can and will co-exist with Square and just grow in parallel, focusing on different markets, unless one - or both - of them decides to expand their target market...

In any case, I am really glad to see a new company come to life to cover the extensive market that was not addressed by Square although, why did Square decide not to target EMV users?  The US is a very large market and represents a very large opportunity but why not go after the global opportunity?  Is EMV such a complex technology?  With all his experience, including the world-wide phenomenon that Twitter has become, you cannot label Dorsey as being too US-centric.  Or can you?  

 
 
Picture
From On-Line Strategies blog:  'According to eMarketer, m-commerce sales in 2011 will nearly double sales from 2010, and then will more than quadruple again by 2015. So what were some of the trends in mobile commerce and alternative payments that emerged in 2011? Let’s take a look...'  Continued.

Trish's Comments: I think that the industry in 2011 can be summed up in one word:  Contradictory.  It seems to me that it is finding multiple opposing solutions to some key challenges, for example:
1)  Google Wallet and NFC payments vs. PayPal and its plans to enable off-line mobile payments that don't depend on NFC adoption.
2)  Banks offering mobile payments that use traditional card networks rails vs. the broader opportunity to enable mobile payments that by-pass these networks.
3)  Square opting to serve only the swipe-card mobile payments segment vs. iZettle total focus on the EMV segment.
4)  Sprint's approach of working with Google Wallet without charging partners or customers (beyond data use) vs. Isis' approach where the other telcos are focusing on defining new revenue models.

And this is just by looking at the US market.  This lack of clear trends also applies to Latin America, Africa and Asia where, extreme market fragmentation makes it very difficult for major trends to form and direct the industry.  In fact, the fear is that, without a leading force it will take a long time for major trends to emerge because winning initiatives may be restricted to one or a few countries that may not allow the critical mass necessary for the technology to take off.  Who could be the regional regulatory body, global macro-corporation or regional entrepreneur to take on this challenge? 

In addition, a number of solutions seem to be half-baked and some others have not even been launched yet.  An example of the former is Google Wallet, which doesn't fully and conveniently integrate offers and doesn't have access to information on Citi's transactions.  PayPal hasn't yet launched its platform.

Obviously, this is typical of a nascent industry and, in fact, is what makes it so exciting and interesting to be part of it.  Nothing is yet written in stone and companies need to place several bets and partner with different players to keep their options open in an ever-changing market.  Fun, fun, fun!

 
 
Picture
From HBR Blog Network by Ndubuisi Ekekwe: 'For the past few decades, emerging technologies such as biotechnology, microelectronics, information technology and communications technologies have become central to the socioeconomic development of nations. These technologies improve productivity and facilitate better living standards when they penetrate into societies. Among them, information technology (IT) has become the most dominant; IT has revolutionized almost every aspect of our lives, public and private, by connecting individuals, institutions and governments in mutually dependent ways. With its ease of adoption, this interdependence has scaled rapidly, unlike any other technology in modern history. In Africa, for example, despite decades of using electricity, no one can claim that the continent has fully adopted it. The same applies to the aerospace and biochemical industries, among others.' Continued.

Trish's comment:  Given my interest in mobile payments and mobile banking, both in developed an developing countries, I found this article, and the comments below, very interesting. 

Although mobile payments is basically an IT technology built on a complex mix of partnerships and systems, it is meant to facilitate day-to-day physical transactions around all the industries Ekekwe lists as critical and fundamental - agriculture, manufacturing, services...  It support the real economy but it does not, in it self, generate goods and services.  It feels a bit like the app he describes that allows farmers to simulate outcome of crops - great app but it still does not provide food.   

Clearly the focus needs to be on having food, energy and services to pay for.  This technology is, as all other types of IT technologies, easy to adopt and easily scalable, it is an enabler of the real economy.  It is a means to an end - a more vibrant and better served economy - not an end in itself.  At the same time, I do think it is a particularly useful piece of IT technology.  Finding a safe and easy way of exchanging money is key to the development of a nation.  The impact of easy-to-use remittances, P2P payments, easy micro-lending and even a way to save in a society can be great.  It doesn't just impact one area or one group within the nation but everybody at all levels.   

Could mobile payments and mobile banking be the one IT technology that governments need to nurture even more? 

 
 
Yesterday Facebook came out with its 'awesome product announcement'. Before the announcement, there were a number of articles and posts out there making educated guesses on the likely focus of the presentation. After it, well, I guess the jury is still out...

The new features announced are:  

·      Group Chat
·      New Design
·      Video Calling

To be honest, I was a bit disappointed. Group chat and video-calling are both welcomed additions, certainly moving in the right direction but, I was hoping for Video Calling via Skype with up to 5 participants and group chat, both available on mobile devices.  My view is that users want to interact with groups – either through voice or messaging – while on the go.  With its 750 million users, this would have been a true quantum leap that would have put FB well ahead of G+.

I am already an avid user of FB, Skype and several messaging systems (cannot find a single one that all my friends use - FB would solve that!) but always on the go. I hardly ever turn on my personal laptop (a Mac) but I always have my iPhone, iPad and iPod close to hand. Basically, I will not be using FB in any way differently from how I was using it last week, which is the disappointing part. I am sure that this will come and I understand that this is an incremental process - this really is about building a platform not about a feature or product – but they can’t let G+ get too far ahead in its feature set.

FB’s next big announcement should be 'Project Spartan', expected to be unveiled in the second half of this month.  This project will establish a new mobile web app platform that could help the social networking giant gain independence from Apple's App Store.  While downplayed by FB, speculation is ripe as to what the specifics of the announcement will be and it’s purpose. 

·      Gigaom thinks that mobile web-apps still need to prove themselves as a viable alternative to native software. 
·      TechLand and Gizmodo believe that this is indeed the right path pointing to the success of the Financial Times building their app entirely over HTML5 and the benefits of by-passing Apple altogether.

My view is that FB’s current position, with its very large user base, gives it enough time to play around and figure things out through trial-and-error. It is a matter of how streamlined the process will be...